I was going to and would love to do it but am a bit disillusioned by a couple of things plus health issues.Tiny, are you planning on doing anymore fur for the animals?
Great! Will have a look. Thank you.Hmmm, I wonder if Bagginsbill's Hair Shader would work with SuperFly renders. It's the fifth one on the File Cabinet page of his site.
Hmmm, I wonder if Bagginsbill's Hair Shader would work with SuperFly renders. It's the fifth one on the File Cabinet page of his site.
Bagginsbill's File Cabinet
I can't guarantee it'll work, but it might help.
I have mentioned it too CWRW, first while in the beta testing group and superfly first appeared and lately to Rendo. I was given a workaround by the beta team but that solution would not work for users in general.
Also don't like having to use RTEjava encoder. How does that work with the fur program you use?
Yes, that's an idea. It had great potential.Hmm now that Rendo instead of SM owns Poser I wonder if they would be interested in True Hair/develop it further?
Oh, I know there's a difference, but thought it might help get to something usable with fur.I do have that on one of my drives dated last year. Guessing I tried it but will look again. The problem with most SF hair shaders is they are made for human hair not fur And yeah there is a difference
1. The superfly not rendering fur well (see pics). As far as I understand most people are using superfly renders now a days. If I could do for example the HW cat without the encoder and for firefly only it would be so much easier.
Hey Tiny- I feel you- the Superfly hair shader for fur just isn't good. I've tried too/messed loads with it and gotten nowhere I like with it. Firefly is much better for fur. I have mentioned this issue to Rendo several times as something to be addressed in new versions of Poser now they own it. Guess all we can do is see what happens.
Thank you Alisa.I've moved these to a new thread, as they are a completely different subject than the original thread