With my annual Audubon’s Birthday Charity Sale going on and it being “Earth Day”, I thought I should comment on the recent news about the National Audubon Society and the 50th anniversary of the US Federal Endangered Species Act.
The Audubon Society just went through a year of soul-searching on the continued use of its name. They decided to keep their name. The reason for this reflection was that some activists were upset that the group, named after John James Audubon, would continue to use his name. They were upset that Audubon was once a slave owner and had been said to have desecrated native American burial grounds. They believe use of the Audubon name promotes those dark deeds.
In my opinion, the Audubon Society was correct in keeping their name because John James Audubon is not remembered as a slave owner, or a racist, but as a naturalist whose illustrated book, “The Birds of America” awoke the American public to the amazing diversity and beauty of birds. His book is still the measure by which all other bird books are measured. I’m not suggesting we sweep the flaws under rugs, but rather simply acknowledge those character flaws and strive to do better.
Audubon isn’t alone in character flaws, I don’t think I’ve met another person who doesn’t have some things they are not exactly proud of. I know and acknowledge I have flaws and strive to learn from them and do better.
This brings me to the polar opposite of what I just wrote. I want to acknowledge a person almost entirely known for his dark deeds, and highlight little known “good” that he did do. John Erlichman was in the Nixon White House, did much of Nixon’s dirty work and personally organized the “plumbers” (that in turn brought down the Nixon White House with Watergate). He served 18 months in prison for his crimes.
What most people don’t know about Erlichman is that he received the Distinguished Eagle Scout Award as a youth and had a strong passion for the environment. It is because of him, we today have the EPA and the Endangered Species Act (which is celebrating its 50th anniversary this month).
According to the Center for Biological Diversity, the Endangered Species Act has protected more than 1,600 species in the U.S., preventing the extinction of 99 percent of the species listed under it. Without the Endangered Species Act, at least 227 species would likely have gone extinct by now since the law’s passage in 1973. In addition, 110 species have seen tremendous recovery since being protected by the act.
Even though 3 years of funding for all the US environment programs costs less than one fighter jet, conservative groups deem these environmental programs wasteful. Since 1985, Congress has decreased Endangered Species Act funding by almost 50 percent (when measured on a per species basis). In addition, the average wait time for a species to be listed has almost doubled over the decades from 5.9 years during the 1990s to some 9.1 years more recently. The upshot is that by the time a species receives protection, it may have already reached extremely low population levels to the point where the ESA may be ineffective in saving it.
Let’s give the Endangered Species Act a proper 50th birthday present by pushing our congressmen to increase its funding.
Be sure write them today.